Semaphore Logo clickable link to home page.
Services
Services
Strategic ConsultingSystem ImplementationInformatics SupportScientific Software Development
Domains
Domains
ClinicalResearchLife Sciences
resources
resources
BlogCase StudiesWhitepapersCareers
ABOUT US
Contact
Contact
Validation
Regulatory Programs
Data Management
Lab Automations

The Importance of Data Integrity in the Laboratory:

Adhering to FDA Standards and ALCOA Principles

by

Brian Jack, General Manager

In today’s highly regulated laboratory environment, maintaining data integrity is not just a matter of good practice—it’s essential for compliance, reliability, and the overall success of lab operations. For lab managers and IT support staff, ensuring data integrity means safeguarding data’s accuracy, completeness, and consistency throughout its lifecycle.

‍

Most off-the-shelf lab informatics systems include robust data integrity controls, providing labs a headstart on data integrity. However, when labs add instruments and equipment to their workflows, they often transfer information between this hardware and their existing software systems via files. When they do this, they may unintentionally weaken data integrity and even become non-compliant.

‍

Many labs use these file-based data instrument integrations, storing files on a shared network server with inadequate access or data integrity controls. This can lead to files being updated without authorization, files out of sync with the lab informatics system, or the wrong file used during a workflow.

‍

Labs need to know the key principles of data integrity and which U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules might apply. You’ll also want to understand how the ALCOA (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate) framework and its iterations (ALCOA+ and ALCOA++) can help your lab achieve high data integrity standards for compliance, and other steps you can take to maintain your business reputation and trust.

Understanding data integrity in the lab

Data integrity refers to the assurance that data is accurate, complete, and reliable. It encompasses measures to prevent unauthorized access and ensure data remains unaltered from creation to archiving. If updates are necessary, they should be transparent and traceable. In a laboratory setting, data integrity is essential for regulatory compliance, reproducibility, and decision-making.

Compliance

Regulatory compliance requires that data integrity is maintained throughout a workflow. Regulatory bodies, such as the FDA, have stringent requirements for data integrity, especially in labs in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and clinical research sectors.

‍

Key FDA standards that might apply to your lab include:

‍

  • 21 CFR Part 11: Part 11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this regulation outlines the criteria under which electronic records and signatures are considered trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records.
  • Good Laboratory Practice (GLP): GLP regulations (21 CFR Part 58) ensure the quality and integrity of non-clinical laboratory studies, which support or are intended to support applications for research or marketing permits.
  • Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP): These regulations (21 CFR Parts 210 and 211) ensure that manufacturers, including labs, follow proper design, monitoring, and control of manufacturing processes and facilities.

‍

Labs seeking Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification or College of American Pathologists (CAP) accreditation also need to ensure data integrity.

Reproducibility

Data integrity is also important for reproducibility, the cornerstone of scientific research. Labs—including those with an open science mandate—must ensure data is accurate and reliable to facilitate peer review and to enable other researchers to validate and replicate experiments. By maintaining high data integrity standards, your lab can uphold scientific rigor, drive innovation, and contribute to advancements in your field.

Decision-making

Reliable data also underpins sound business decision-making. Whether your lab is investing in product development, wanting to enhance quality control, making regulatory submissions, allocating resources, or making choices about research direction, you’ll need to be sure your decisions are based on accurate data-driven insights. Data integrity controls can provide confidence that decisions stem from trustworthy information.

The ALCOA++ data integrity framework can keep labs on track

All lab software solutions should be designed with data integrity in mind. However, labs adding new instruments, like automated liquid handlers, should add data integrity as a documented requirement, whether using a file-based or API-based integration solution.

‍

For existing equipment integrations, labs also need to assess the integrity of their data from end to end. This is particularly important for labs with file-based integrations. A reliance on files for recording and transferring data can be problematic due to how the files are created, where they are stored, and who has access to them.

‍

An external consultant who understands the regulatory needs of your sector and follows software engineering best practices can help with this task. However, before hiring a consultant, confirm that they are familiar with and willing to apply the ALCOA++ data integrity framework. If your internal IT support team will perform the task, they should use the framework, too.

‍

The original ALCOA framework, defined by the FDA, introduced five data integrity principles:

‍

  • Attributable: Data should indicate who performed an action and when.
  • Legible: Data should be maintained in a readable form.
  • Contemporaneous: Data should be recorded at the time the work is performed by a system or person.
  • Original: Data should be the original recorded observation or a certified true copy.
  • Accurate: Data should be correct, precise, and reflective of the actual observations.

‍

The next iteration, the ALCOA+ framework, introduced four additional data integrity principles:

‍

  • Complete: All data, including any changes made, must be documented.
  • Consistent: Data should be recorded in a consistent manner throughout the data lifecycle.
  • Enduring: Data should be recorded on durable media, which should not degrade over time.
  • Available: Data should be accessible for review or audit throughout the data retention period.

‍

The most recent update, the ALCOA++ framework, introduced another key principle:

‍

  • Traceable: Data should be traceable across the data life cycle, with changes recorded in the metadata.

‍

The European Medicines Agency describes each principle in more detail.

Other steps your lab can take to ensure data integrity

While the ALCOA++ framework is a valuable tool, we recommend labs also consider taking several other measures to support data integrity.

‍

  • Training and awareness: When staff understand the vital importance of data integrity for the lab’s business and maintaining compliance, they will be more intentional in performing their work according to documented procedures. Regular training will ensure they know how to use the informatics systems and follow lab processes. At the same time, the more your lab can automate systems, the less chance there is of unintentional human error. 
  • Standard operating procedures (SOPs): Every lab should maintain current detailed SOPs covering data handling, storage, and archiving. These SOPs can also help ensure your informatics systems and integrations match your current workflows.
  • Electronic systems: All lab software should be validated and comply with appropriate regulatory requirements, rules, and guidance.
  • Audit trails: New and existing software solutions should have built-in auditing to track all data entries and modifications for transparency, accountability, and compliance. Tracking entities and workflows with your laboratory information management system (LIMS) can help with this.
  • Data security: Robust security measures, including user access controls, are essential for protecting data from unauthorized access, tampering, or loss. Other important security considerations include the frequency of data backups, having a disaster recovery plan, regular security audits, and performing timely software updates. 

Conclusion

Labs that must comply with regulatory requirements, and those that will have to in the coming years, must pay close attention to data integrity. FDA auditors can easily recognize when the integrity of integration data does not comply with regulatory rules or is at risk of non-compliance. Learning about this topic now will enable your lab to fix any potential compliance problems before you are forced to by an auditor.

‍

Furthermore, maintaining data integrity is a cornerstone of effective laboratory management, even for unregulated labs. By understanding and implementing ALCOA++ principles, labs can ensure their data remains accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. It also fosters a culture of quality and integrity within the lab, ultimately contributing to the advancement of scientific research and development, and improving lives.

‍

The journey toward impeccable data integrity is one of continuous improvement, vigilance, and adherence to best practices. If your lab needs to assess existing file-based interfaces or is adding new equipment that requires integration with your lab informatics system, contact our team today.

‍

Explore our blog

All Blog Posts

Updating Your Lab Workflow? 4 Feature Implementation Scenarios to Consider

When updating lab workflows, not all software changes are created equal. This blog post outlines four common implementation scenarios—ranging from enabling an out-of-the-box (OOTB) feature to developing a fully custom solution—and explains how each impacts cost, effort, and timelines. Whether you’re adding a new assay or integrating an instrument, understanding these scenarios helps labs plan smarter, reduce risk, and align stakeholders. Read on to learn how to choose the right approach for your lab’s needs and how Semaphore Solutions can help guide your next move.

6
min read

Mapping Lab Systems the Right Way: Workflow vs. State Diagrams

Workflow and state diagrams play a crucial role in documenting and visualizing laboratory systems. Both are invaluable for labs implementing a laboratory information management system (LIMS) or adding automations to streamline laboratory operations, reduce errors and redundancies, and ensure regulatory compliance. However, each type of diagram serves a distinct purpose.

7
min read

Where Do Spreadsheets Fit in a Modern Lab’s Informatics Strategy?

Spreadsheets are not always the best tool for every use case in today’s labs. When do they work, and when do they not work?

6
min read
Semaphore Logo
  • Services
  • Domains
  • Resources
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • 1 (844) 744-3577 ext 1
  • 200-844 Courtney St.
  • Victoria, BC V8W 1C4
  • Canada
LinkedIn Social Media Icon Linking to Semaphore Account
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
All Rights Reserved © Semaphore Solutions Inc.